Prediction Markets and Taxes: What Investors Need to Know
Prediction markets have experienced rapid growth over the past few years, attracting investors, cryptocurrency enthusiasts, and high-net-worth individuals seeking alternative ways to participate in financial markets. Platforms like Kalshi have introduced traders to a different class of transactions—specifically, purchasing and selling contracts based on the probability of future events occurring.
While public attention has largely focused on how these markets operate, an equally critical issue is starting to emerge: the tax implications of these transactions.
Recent legislative developments in North Carolina suggest that state governments are beginning to establish tax frameworks specifically for prediction markets. Although this new law applies to prediction-market operators rather than individual traders, it represents a much larger regulatory shift. Federal and state regulators increasingly view prediction markets as a permanent component of the financial landscape, which means tax rules, compliance expectations, and reporting obligations will likely continue to evolve.
For anyone actively trading prediction contracts, now is the time to start paying attention to the changing regulatory environment.
Understanding Prediction Markets and Event Contracts
Prediction markets allow participants to trade contracts tied directly to the outcome of future events. Rather than purchasing stock in a company or investing in mutual funds, traders buy contracts that increase or decrease in value based on whether a specific event occurs.
Common examples include contracts based on questions such as:
- Will the Federal Reserve raise interest rates this year?
- Will inflation exceed a certain percentage?
- Will Congress pass a specific piece of legislation?
- Will a designated economic indicator reach a stated level?
Although these platforms can resemble sports betting at first glance, there is a major legal distinction.
Many prediction-market platforms operate under the oversight of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), the federal agency responsible for regulating U.S. derivatives markets. Rather than classifying these platforms as traditional sportsbooks, the CFTC regulates certain event contracts as financial products. This distinction is becoming increasingly important for both regulators and taxpayers.
The Significance of North Carolina's New Law
North Carolina recently enacted legislation that imposes a 6% tax on the net trading fee revenue earned by prediction-market operators attributable to the state. The same legislative package also increased the state's tax rate on sports wagering.
The real significance of this law is not simply that a new tax was created.
Instead, North Carolina chose to recognize federally regulated prediction-market platforms separately from traditional sports betting. Rather than attempting to classify these markets under existing gambling definitions, the state explicitly acknowledged the federal regulatory framework established by the CFTC.
For individual investors, this law does not create a new state tax on personal trading activity. However, it signals that lawmakers are beginning to build tax systems around prediction markets as their own distinct asset class. This is an important development because once governments begin creating industry-specific tax rules, additional administrative guidance typically follows.
The Federal Regulatory Framework Takes Shape
The federal government is also playing an active role in defining how these markets are treated. The CFTC has consistently maintained that federally regulated event-contract markets fall under its sole jurisdiction rather than being subject to state gambling laws. The agency has recently defended this position in litigation involving state-level attempts to regulate prediction-market activity.
While these legal disputes primarily impact the operators of prediction-market exchanges, they also demonstrate that these markets are establishing themselves within the broader U.S. financial system. As this recognition grows, further tax guidance and information reporting expectations are likely to follow.
The Core Challenge: How Are Prediction Market Winnings Taxed?
The biggest hurdle currently facing investors is that the IRS has not yet issued comprehensive guidance specifically addressing the taxation of prediction market transactions. As a result, tax professionals must evaluate several possible approaches based on existing tax law.
The Gambling Income Approach
One possibility is to treat prediction market winnings as gambling income. Under this framework, net winnings are generally taxed as ordinary income at the taxpayer's marginal tax rate. Furthermore, gambling losses may only offset gambling winnings if the taxpayer itemizes deductions, and current law limits the deduction for gambling losses to 90% of those losses. In some situations, this limitation could result in taxable income even if the taxpayer broke even economically over the course of the year.
The Capital Assets Approach
Another option is to treat prediction market contracts as capital assets. Under this method, gains and losses would be reported similarly to other property transactions, with individual trades detailed on Form 8949. Net capital losses would offset capital gains, and, subject to annual limits, up to $3,000 of ordinary income.
The Section 1256 Contracts Approach
A third option may apply to certain contracts traded on CFTC-designated contract markets. Depending on the nature of the contract and applicable tax rules, some transactions could potentially qualify for treatment under Section 1256 of the Internal Revenue Code. This would grant the taxpayer the highly favorable 60% long-term and 40% short-term capital gain split, regardless of how long the contract was held.
Because the IRS has not provided definitive guidance, there is currently no one-size-fits-all answer for reporting prediction market transactions.
The Practical Value of a Conservative Tax Reporting Strategy
In the absence of clear IRS guidelines, many tax professionals favor a conservative reporting position.
Treating prediction market winnings as ordinary income generally represents the most audit-resistant approach because it applies the least favorable tax treatment to the taxpayer. While this choice may result in paying more tax than might ultimately be required under future rules, it significantly reduces the risk that the IRS will argue income was underreported.
Taking a conservative stance also helps shield taxpayers from accuracy-related penalties if the IRS eventually adopts a strict interpretation of these transactions.
Importantly, if the IRS later issues formal guidance establishing more favorable treatment, taxpayers may have the opportunity to amend previously filed returns. In general, a taxpayer has three years from the date the original return was filed, or two years from the date the tax was paid, whichever is later, to claim a refund by filing an amended return.
For many investors, paying a slightly higher tax liability today is preferable to facing back taxes, interest, and penalties later if the IRS rejects an aggressive reporting position.
Key Tax Planning Questions for Investors
Whenever a new investment vehicle rises in popularity, complex tax issues generally follow, and prediction markets are no exception. Active investors should consider several critical questions:
- How should my gains and losses be reported on my tax return?
- Which specific tax treatment is appropriate for my trading transactions?
- Will exchange reporting requirements change in the near future?
- What records must I maintain to support my positions?
- Will more transaction information eventually be reported directly to the IRS?
- How will my state of residence tax these transactions?
These are not questions to leave for tax prep season. They are planning questions that should be discussed and resolved before your tax return is filed.
Lessons from the Rise of Cryptocurrency
Investors who have participated in cryptocurrency markets have seen this pattern play out before.
In cryptocurrency's early years, official tax reporting guidance was highly limited, and many taxpayers assumed the IRS would pay little attention to digital assets. Over time, however, the IRS dramatically increased its enforcement efforts, expanded information reporting requirements, revised tax forms, and mandated extensive disclosures from platforms.
While prediction markets are not cryptocurrency, and there is no indication they will be regulated in the exact same manner, they share an important characteristic: both represent emerging financial products that developed faster than the tax rules surrounding them. As prediction markets continue to expand, it is reasonable to expect additional IRS guidance, expanded information reporting, and new state compliance rules.
Establishing Thorough Recordkeeping Habits
Regardless of how future tax rules develop, maintaining meticulous records remains one of the best ways to protect yourself.
If you actively trade prediction contracts, you should retain the following documentation:
- Trade confirmations showing execution details
- Exact purchase and settlement dates
- Contract values at buy and sell
- Trading and transaction fees
- Monthly or annual account statements
- Annual tax reporting documents provided by the platforms
Keeping organized records throughout the year makes tax preparation significantly easier, allows us to properly evaluate reporting positions, and helps support your tax return if questions arise from taxing authorities.
Anticipating State-Level Policy Changes
North Carolina is unlikely to be the last state to address prediction markets.
As these platforms continue to expand, additional states will likely examine how to tax the operators active within their borders and determine how prediction-market activity fits into their existing state tax codes.
Some states may follow North Carolina's lead by recognizing federally regulated platforms while imposing operator-level taxes. Others may pursue more aggressive regulations, while some may wait for further federal guidance before taking action. Regardless of the path individual states choose, the trend is clear: prediction markets are transitioning from a niche concept into the mainstream financial market, and tax policy is catching up.
The Value of Planning Ahead
Too often, investors think about the tax consequences of their activity only after the calendar year has closed. By then, many planning opportunities have already passed.
If you actively trade prediction market contracts, one of the most critical decisions is not just how much profit you generated, but how you choose to report those gains and losses. With the IRS yet to issue definitive guidance, establishing a reasonable, well-documented reporting position is just as important as the tax calculations themselves. A proactive review of your trading activity before filing can identify potential reporting issues, evaluate the best tax treatment under current law, and prepare you to respond to future regulatory updates.
Navigating the Changing Tax Environment
Prediction markets are shifting from an emerging financial trend to a recognized, regulated segment of the investment landscape. North Carolina's recent legislation is significant because it demonstrates that state governments are beginning to build specific tax policies for this growing industry. At the same time, the absence of comprehensive IRS guidance means investors must make careful, deliberate reporting decisions based on current tax law while remaining prepared for future developments.
The rules are changing, and proactive tax planning today is the best way to prevent unexpected tax surprises tomorrow. If you are actively trading prediction market contracts, let's review your activity now so we can keep you ahead of changing federal and state tax requirements.
Want tax planning tips and insights?
Sign up for our newsletter.